It’s been a controversial question in many schools across the U.S.
whether or not they should continue funding their music programs (orchestra,
band, choir, etc.). Music is fun, lively and a bit distracting, so why keep it?
There are many reasons to keep music in school. For starters musically
involved kids of any age usually rank top 25% of their class. Music is Math,
English, and History all in one. You have to count your rhythms as well as your
rests. You have to understand what the music is telling you. Words like forte
meaning strong and loud have to be understood to correctly play a piece, and
you must understand the origin of music. The era, author, and background of everything
you play has meaning, a specific significance, and a story.
Why do some kids say they are too stressed and don’t have time for work,
or they are falling behind because of music? Well, music isn’t as easy as do,
re, me. It is something that takes years to master and it’s always an ongoing
process. You never stop learning. Students that are involved in music are set
at higher level than others. They’re given more responsibility as well as
homework. These students are relied on by an ensemble, a group, and an
individual. If a student gets behind it’s generally their own fault for not
pushing forward and setting aside time for what needs to be done. Music
requires you to plan a set schedule and stick with it.
Why should schools keep music then? Music is an art, a passion, a study,
and teaches people of all ages’ responsibility, Math, English, History,
planning, and so much more. Getting rid of something so unique and profitable
such as music is going to lead to a downfall. Now, don’t you think music should
stay?
Nice points about music here, Jordan. What about the costs of music programs? Are they more or less expensive than other subjects?
ReplyDelete